Skip to content
Logo — It’s All AboutThe Team
  • Home
  • Who We Serve
    • By Category
      • SaaS
      • Professional Services
      • Platforms (Large Ecosystems)
      • Private Equity
    • By Role
      • Chief Revenue Officers (CRO)
      • Chief Financial Officers (CFO)
      • Chief Marketing Officers (CMO)
      • Chief Executive Officers (CEO)
      • Sales Leaders
      • Partnership Professionals
  • Solutions
    • By Partner Program Maturity
      • Partnerships Foundation
      • Partnerships Acceleration
      • Ecosystem-Wide Orchestration
    • Specialized Solutions
      • Net-New Named Account Development
      • Large Ecosystems
      • M&A: Post-Acquisition Internal Cross-Selling
  • Education
  • Company
    • Our History
    • Security
  • Login
Logo — It’s All AboutThe Team
  • Home
  • Who We Serve
    • By Category
      • SaaS
      • Professional Services
      • Platforms (Large Ecosystems)
      • Private Equity
    • By Role
      • Chief Revenue Officers (CRO)
      • Chief Financial Officers (CFO)
      • Chief Marketing Officers (CMO)
      • Chief Executive Officers (CEO)
      • Sales Leaders
      • Partnership Professionals
  • Solutions
    • By Partner Program Maturity
      • Partnerships Foundation
      • Partnerships Acceleration
      • Ecosystem-Wide Orchestration
    • Specialized Solutions
      • Net-New Named Account Development
      • Large Ecosystems
      • M&A: Post-Acquisition Internal Cross-Selling
  • Education
  • Company
    • Our History
    • Security
  • Login
  • Home
  • Who We Serve
    • By Category
      • SaaS
      • Professional Services
      • Platforms (Large Ecosystems)
      • Private Equity
    • By Role
      • Chief Revenue Officers (CRO)
      • Chief Financial Officers (CFO)
      • Chief Marketing Officers (CMO)
      • Chief Executive Officers (CEO)
      • Sales Leaders
      • Partnership Professionals
  • Solutions
    • By Partner Program Maturity
      • Partnerships Foundation
      • Partnerships Acceleration
      • Ecosystem-Wide Orchestration
    • Specialized Solutions
      • Net-New Named Account Development
      • Large Ecosystems
      • M&A: Post-Acquisition Internal Cross-Selling
  • Education
  • Company
    • Our History
    • Security
  • Login
Back to all blogs
  • Co-Selling
  • Partner Enablement & Onboarding
Alex Buckles

Partner Newsletter: What It Is and How to Run One

Partner manager reviewing color-coded partner segment lists on a tablet in a calm modern office, soft amber light from the right.

What is a partner newsletter?

Short answer: a partner newsletter is a recurring communication sent to a company’s partners to keep them informed, enabled, and active. In 2026, the ones that work are not announcements; they are activation tools that drive a specific partner action in every send. A monthly roundup of company news is a broadcast. A partner newsletter is a nudge toward a registered deal, a co-sell conversation, or a completed enablement step.

The partner enablement program supplies the assets the newsletter points at, and partner activation is the outcome the newsletter is judged on. The newsletter is the delivery channel; the enablement and activation work is what gives it something useful to deliver.

The distinction matters because most partner newsletters fail the same way. They become an internal-news digest (new logos, product releases, team announcements) that partners skim and forget. That content belongs in a blog, not in a channel meant to move partner behavior.

A working definition has three characteristics. It is recurring, with a predictable cadence so partners learn to expect it. It is segmented, because a reseller and a tech ISV do not need the same nudge. And it is action-oriented, with one primary call-to-action tied to a partner outcome in every send.

Why a partner newsletter matters in 2026

Partner attention is the scarcest resource in any program. A partner newsletter is one of the few always-on channels you fully control, and most teams waste it on news nobody asked for.

Three forces make this urgent. First, partners sell for multiple vendors, so your share of their attention is small and contested. Second, the cost of partner inactivity is now visible, programs are measured on activated partners, not signed ones. Third, the channels partners actually read have narrowed, which makes the few you own more valuable, not less.

The mechanical case is simple. A partner who registers a deal, joins a co-sell motion, or completes a certification step is an activated partner. A partner newsletter that consistently nudges one of those actions is a low-cost activation engine. A partner newsletter that reports company news is a cost with no return: it consumes the partnerships team’s time and the partner’s attention and produces nothing measurable.

This is also a trust signal. A newsletter that respects the partner’s time (short, relevant, one ask) tells the partner the program is run by people who value their attention. A bloated newsletter tells them the opposite.

How a partner newsletter actually works

Five mechanics turn a partner newsletter into an activation tool rather than a broadcast: segment the list, attach one call-to-action per send, set a predictable cadence, lead with partner-useful content, and track a partner outcome.

  1. Segment the list: a reseller, a tech ISV, and a referral partner need different nudges. Segment the newsletter list by partner type so each group gets content relevant to its motion. An unsegmented newsletter is written for everyone and lands for no one.
  2. One call-to-action per send: every issue points at a single partner action (register a deal, book a co-sell sync, complete an enablement module, claim a co-marketing slot). Multiple asks split attention and none of them get done. Pick one.
  3. Set a predictable cadence: monthly is the common floor; bi-weekly works for active segments. The cadence matters more than the frequency, partners should know when the newsletter arrives so it becomes a habit, not a surprise.
  4. Lead with partner-useful content: the content earns the open: a new co-sell play, a competitive insight, a customer story the partner can use, an enablement resource the partner has not opened yet. Company news goes last or not at all.
  5. Track the outcome: tie the call-to-action to something measurable: deal registrations in the period, enablement completions, co-sell syncs booked. A newsletter you cannot measure is a newsletter you cannot improve.

Programs that run all five have a partner newsletter that shows up in the activation numbers. Programs that skip segmentation and the single call-to-action end up with an open rate, a click rate, and no behavior change.

Common pitfalls

Four repeating failures show up across partner-newsletter programs, and they are easier to design out at the start than to fix after the open rates plateau.

  • The news-digest trap: a newsletter full of company announcements, new hires, and product releases reads like internal comms. Partners did not subscribe to your company news. They subscribed (implicitly) to content that helps them sell. Lead with that.
  • No segmentation: one newsletter to the whole partner base is written to the average partner, who does not exist. The reseller skips the ISV content, the ISV skips the reseller content, and engagement decays. Segment by partner type.
  • Too many calls-to-action: a newsletter with five asks gets zero of them done. Attention does not divide cleanly. One primary call-to-action per send, every send.
  • No measurement: a newsletter measured only on open and click rates tells you the email worked, not that the program worked. Measure the partner action (registrations, completions, syncs) or you are optimizing the wrong number.

What this looks like in practice

A partner newsletter runs on three layers, an email platform for sends and segmentation, the PRM for the partner list and enablement assets, and the CRM for the outcome the call-to-action drives toward.

a mid-stage SaaS company runs a bi-weekly partner newsletter segmented into resellers and tech ISVs. Each issue leads with one useful asset (a new competitive battle card for resellers, a new integration use case for ISVs) and closes with a single call-to-action to register a deal or book a co-sell sync. The team measures deal registrations attributable to the newsletter window. The newsletter stops being a broadcast and starts being a line in the activation report. PartnerStack and Impartner both publish useful guidance on connecting partner communication cadence to activation; treat their patterns as benchmarks for cadence design.

Forecastable’s POV

Most partner newsletters are company newsletters with the word “partner” in the subject line. The fix is not better writing; it is a different purpose. A partner newsletter exists to move one partner behavior, not to report.

The most common failure I see is a category error: the team treats the partner newsletter as a communications deliverable when it is actually an activation deliverable. Communications deliverables get judged on whether they were sent and opened. Activation deliverables get judged on whether a partner did something. Those are different jobs, and the second one is the only one worth the partnerships team’s time.

The fix is to start every issue from the action, not the content. Before anyone writes a word, the question is: what is the one thing we want a partner to do after reading this? Register a deal. Book a sync. Finish a module. The content then exists to earn the open and make that one action easy. A newsletter built backward from the action is short, focused, and measurable. A newsletter built forward from “what news do we have” is long, scattered, and a broadcast.

The second move is to segment ruthlessly and accept that this means more work. The single unsegmented newsletter is easier to produce and worse at its job. A reseller and a tech ISV are running different motions, and a newsletter that serves both serves neither. If segmentation feels like too much overhead, that is a signal the program has more partner types than it can actually support, which is a recruitment problem worth surfacing, not a newsletter problem to paper over.

The third move: kill the newsletter if it cannot be measured. A partner newsletter that has run for a year on open rates alone, with no line in the activation report, is consuming time it has not earned. Either connect it to a tracked partner outcome or stop sending it. The discipline of “this channel must produce a measurable partner action” is what separates a partner program from a partner mailing list.

Forecastable is an independent third-party professional services company. Our evaluations of partner-communication platforms are based on publicly-available information as of May 2026 and our own client experience.

Frequently asked questions

What should a partner newsletter include?
One useful asset that helps partners sell (a battle card, a co-sell play, a customer story, an enablement resource) and one clear call-to-action tied to a partner outcome. Company news should be minimal or absent.

How often should you send a partner newsletter?
Monthly is the common floor; bi-weekly works for active segments. Consistency matters more than frequency, partners should know when it arrives so it becomes a habit.

Should a partner newsletter be segmented?
Yes. Resellers, tech ISVs, and referral partners run different motions and need different nudges. An unsegmented newsletter is written for an average partner who does not exist.

How do you measure a partner newsletter?
Measure the partner action it drives (deal registrations, enablement completions, co-sell syncs booked in the send window) not just open and click rates. Open rates tell you the email worked, not that the program did.

What is the difference between a partner newsletter and partner enablement?
The newsletter is a channel; enablement is the content and capability behind it. A good partner newsletter is a delivery mechanism that points partners toward enablement resources and prompts them to use what they already have.

How many calls-to-action should a partner newsletter have?
One primary call-to-action per send. Multiple asks split partner attention and none of them get completed. Pick the single action that matters most for that issue.

Who should own the partner newsletter?
The partnerships team owns it, often with partner marketing producing it. Whoever owns it must own the outcome metric too, the newsletter is judged on partner action, not on send volume.

Next step

Open your last three partner newsletters and count the calls-to-action in each. If any issue has more than one primary ask, that is the first fix: rebuild the next issue backward from a single partner action. Then check whether you are measuring open rates only, or whether the newsletter has a line in the activation report. If it is the first, connect it to a tracked partner outcome before the next send.

Talk to our team about turning partner communications into partner activation →

The partner program hub holds the broader context on where partner communication fits inside the program design.

Uncover Your Growth Potential

Whether starting with a single sales team or a single partner, any co-sell motion can be live within 30 days.

Schedule a Discovery Call
Latest Insights
Two colleagues analyze a project on a large desktop monitor in a modern office.
  • Co-Selling
Alex Buckles

HubSpot Deal Stages Co-Sell: How to Set Them Up

What is a HubSpot deal stages co-sell setup? Short answer: A HubSpot deal stages co-sell setup is the way you configure your pipeline so a deal worked with a partner is tracked as one, from the stage where the partner enters to the credit captured at close. It uses your existing pipeline plus a few […]

Read Article
Three professionals in a meeting room discuss near whiteboards with plans and checklists.
  • Co-Selling
Alex Buckles

Close Plan vs Mutual Action Plan: The Difference

What is the difference: close plan vs mutual action plan? Short answer: The difference in close plan vs mutual action plan is scope: a mutual action plan maps the whole pursuit from evaluation to a decision, while a close plan maps the final segment of dated steps that get an agreed deal to signature. They […]

Read Article
A seller and a buyer filling in a mutual action plan template on a shared screen, a structured grid of milestones, owners, and dates partly completed, a partner rep pointing at an empty row, deep navy and warm amber palette
  • Co-Selling
Alex Buckles

Mutual Action Plan Template: Structure and Example

What is a mutual action plan template? Short answer: A mutual action plan template is a reusable structure, a set of fields for milestones, owners, dates, and dependencies, that a buyer and seller fill in to produce the joint roadmap for a specific deal, so they are not designing the format from scratch each time. […]

Read Article
A vendor seller and a buyer building a mutual action plan on a shared screen, a dated list of joint milestones from evaluation to go-live with owners on both sides, a partner rep adding a step, deep navy and warm amber palette
  • Co-Selling
Alex Buckles

Mutual Action Plan: What It Is and How to Build One

What is a mutual action plan? Short answer: A mutual action plan is the joint, dated roadmap that a buyer and a seller agree to follow to move a deal from evaluation to a decision and beyond, listing the milestones, the owner on each side, and the dates, across the whole pursuit rather than only […]

Read Article
Logo — It’s All AboutThe Team

Quick Links

  • Who We Serve
  • Solutions
  • Resources
  • Pricing
  • Our History

Social Media

  • Linkedin

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
Quick Links
  • Who We Serve
  • Solutions
  • Resources
  • Pricing
  • Our History
Social Media
  • Linkedin
Legal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Stay ahead on ecosystem-led growth

Logo — It’s All AboutThe Team
© 2025 Forecastable. All rights reserved.
Book Your Strategy Call
Request Enrollment Details

[contact-form-7 id=”dfbeed3″ title=”Request Enrollment Details”]

Mollie Bodensteiner

Revops Advisory
  Mollie Bodensteiner is an experienced operations professional with a demonstrated track record of utilizing technology to support operational processes that drive performance and innovation. She currently is the Vice President of Operations at Sound and owns go-to-market agency, MB Solutions. Mollie has previously held operations leadership roles at Deel, Syncari, Corteva and Marketo. She has over 14 years of experience in both B2C and B2B operations and technology. When she is not working, Mollie enjoys spending time with her husband, three small children, and two large dogs. Childhood Career/Dream: Growing up in the age of Disney and Nick@Nite I always wanted to be a child actor (good thing that never was actually pursued 🙂 Favorite Win: I am not sure I have a specific “win” but I think I get the most joy and excitement from coaching others and watching them hit major milestones in their career. The first time you get to promote someone on your team or watch them lead a major project – are always career highlights! Personal Fun Facts: Favorite Song: If it’s love, Train Favorite Movie: Good Will Hunting Favorite Meme: Disaster Girl
Forecastable resources: Co-Sell Orchestration Platform · All Use Cases · Live in 30 Days · Co-Sell Playbook

Kelsey Buckles

Director of Operations

 

My journey from Education to Operations has equipped me with a unique perspective and skill set that perfectly aligns with Forecastable’s mission to help businesses improve sales collaboration through partner co-selling strategies.

At Forecastable, I am passionate about empowering teams and organizations to unlock the full potential of strategic partnerships. By leveraging my expertise in communication, leadership, and operational efficiency, I contribute to creating seamless co-selling processes that align with business goals and deliver exceptional results.

The intersection of my educational foundation and operational experience fuels my dedication to fostering alignment, building trust, and enhancing collaboration between partners. I am driven by the opportunity to contribute to a platform that not only optimizes sales strategies but also strengthens relationships that lead to long-term growth.

Paul Jonhson

Chief Technology Officer (Co-founder)

 

Paul Johnson has 20+ years of software development and consulting experience for a variety of organizations, ranging from startups to large-enterprise organization with highly-complex needs.

Mr. Johnson has a long track record of successful technology deployments.
This, combined with his deep passion for machine learning and exceptional user experience design, allows him to lead our technical direction from the front with confidence.

Alex Buckles

Product, Partnerships, and Value Engineering (Co-founder)

 

After serving in The United States Marine Corps, Alex Buckles spent the next two decades as a student of revenue production and an advocate for innovation.

Along the way, he has helped numerous companies achieve double and triple-digit growth by crafting and executing high-performing go-to-market strategies, with co-selling at the center of each.

As a once-advanced technical marketer, an expert sales & partner professional, and a strong customer success advocate, Mr. Buckles understands the impact of these functions aligning not only on revenue production, but on the day-to-day execution of the go-to-market strategy. This concept of revenue-team alignment is what quickly became the foundation of Forecastable back in January of 2018.

In his free time, you’ll find him spending quality time with his children, one of whom is on the autism spectrum. 1 in 36 children in the U.S. are on the spectrum and boys are four times more likely to be diagnosed than girls.

With that in mind, Mr. Buckles plans on dedicating the rest of his life serving those living with autism, through his organization Pathways for Autism. From his perspective, there must be a scalable and financially self-sustaining infrastructure established to put as many individuals with autism as possible on a path towards complete independence as adults.